INVESTIGATE THE ROLE OF IMPULSIVITY IN DECISIONS MAKING DURING GAMBLING TASK: CASE STUDY

Authors

  • Gyan Prakash
  • Azizuddin Khan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20894/IJMSR.117.004.001.004

Keywords:

Decisions Making, Impulsivity, Iowa Gambling Task, Personality and Information Processing Style.

Abstract

The aim of the current study is to understand impulsivity, reward and loss sensitivity in decision making using Iowa Gambling Task and investigate how impulsivity affects decision- making using BIS/BAS scale. We investigate how the personality trait determines decision making using NEO-FFI scale. Method: We assessed 130 participants for conducting two types of experiment (1) Choice Behavior Test is conducted with the help of Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) on the computer screen.(2) Personality Test is conducted with the help of Behavior Inhibition system and Behavior Approach System (BIS/BAS), NEO-F FI( NEO-Five Factor Inventory) scale and Rational-Experiential Inventory (REI).Results: The result indicated that participants who were low on impulsivity fared worst on IGT task compared to the participants who were high on impulsivity. Similar results were demonstrated for personality traits and information processing styles. The results imply that personality traits determine decision-making process. Similarly, information processing styles evaluate preferences for information processing that determine the decisions making and Impulsivity affects decision making.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Gyan Prakash

Project Research Intern, Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Azizuddin Khan

Assistant Professor, Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai, India.

References

[1] Izabeth Cauffman, and Elizabeth P. Shulman, Laurence Steinberg, Eric Claus, and Marie T. Banich , Sandra Graham and Jennifer Woolard(2007) “Age Differences in Affective Decision Making as Indexed by Performance on the Iowa Gambling Task”, Developmental Psychology 2010, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp 193–207.

[2] Anton Amuja, Oscar Garc, J_er^ome Rossier, Luis F Garc(2005),”Comparison of the NEO- FFI, the NEO-FFI-R and an alternative short version of the NEO-PI-R (NEO-60) in Swiss and Spanish samples” Personality and Individual Differences, vol- 38, pp 591–604.

[3] Andreu Vigil-Colet (2007). "Impulsivity and decision making in the balloon analog risk-taking task," Personality and Individual Differences vol-43, pp 37–45, doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.005.

[4] Anouk Scheres and Alan G Sanfey(2006 )”Individual differences in decision making: Drive and reward responsiveness affect strategic bargaining in economic games," Behavioral and Brain Functions, 2:35 doi:10.1186/1744-9081-2-35 pp 1-8( (page number not for citation purposes).

[5] Bechara, H. Domasio, D. Tranel & A.R. Domasio (2005)“ The Iowa Gambling Task & the somatic marker hypothesis: Some questions and answers” cognitive science, vol.9 N0.4 page 159-162.

[6] Carver, C. & White, T. (1994) "Behavioral Activation, and affective response to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 319-333.

[7] Costa, P.T., Jr, P. T. & McCrae, R.R. (1992). “NEO Five Factor Scale," Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175-215.

[8]Costa, P.T., Jr, P. T., & McCrae, R.R. (1992),” Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences”, Journal of Personality, 13 (6), 653-665.

[9] DIRK J. M. SMITS and P. D. BOECK (2006),” From BIS/BAS to the Big Five “European Journal of Personality Eur. J. Pers. 20: 255–270 (2006) Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com).DOI:10.1002/per.583.

Downloads

Published

2012-12-15

Issue

Section

Articles