A METHODOLOGY FOR DIRECT AND INDIRECT DISCRIMINATION PREVENTION IN DATA MINING

Authors

  • Rajkumar V

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20894/IJMSR.117.005.001.005

Keywords:

datamining, security, privacy data

Abstract

Along with privacy, discrimination is a very important issue when considering the legal and ethical aspects of data mining. It is more than observable that the majority people do not want to be discriminated because of their gender, nationality, religion, age and so on, particularly when those aspects are used for making decisions about them like giving them a occupation, loan, insurance, etc. determining such possible biases and eliminating them from the training data without harming their decision-making utility is therefore extremely popular. For this reason, antidiscrimination methods containing discrimination detection and prevention have been introduced in data mining. Discrimination prevention consists of suggest models that do not lead to discriminatory decisions even if the original training datasets are essentially biased. In this section, by focusing on the discrimination prevention, we present taxonomy for classifying and examining discrimination prevention schemes. Then, we begin a group of pre-processing discrimination prevention schemes and indicate the special features of each approach and how these approaches deal with direct or indirect discrimination. A production of metrics used to estimate the performance of those approaches is also specified. In conclusion, we finish our learn by specifying interesting future directions in this research body.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Rajkumar V

Master of Computer Applications, Madha Engineering College, Chennai.

References

[1]. R. Agrawal and R. Srikant, “Fast Algorithms for Mining Association Rules in Large Databases,” Proc. 20th Int’l Conf. Very Large Data Bases, pp. 487-499, 1994.

[2]. T. Calders and S. Verwer, “Three Naive Bayes Approaches for Discrimination-Free Classification,” Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 277-292, 2010.

[3]. European Commission, “EU Directive 2004/113/EC on Anti- Discrimination,” http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?ui=OJ:L:2004:373:0037:0043:EN:PDF, 2004.

[4]. European Commission, “EU Directive 2006/54/EC on Anti-Discrimination,” http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:204:0023:0036:en:PDF, 2006.

[5]. S. Hajian, J. Domingo-Ferrer, and A. Martı´nez-Balleste´, “Discrimination Prevention in Data Mining for Intrusion and Crime Detection,” Proc. IEEE Symp. Computational Intelligence in Cyber Security (CICS ’11), pp. 47-54, 2011.

[6]. S. Hajian, J. Domingo-Ferrer, and A. Martı´nez-Balleste´, “Rule Protection for Indirect Discrimination Prevention in DataMining,” Proc. Eighth Int’l Conf. Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence (MDAI ’11), pp. 211-222, 2011.

[7]. F. Kamiran and T. Calders, “Classification without Discrimination,” Proc. IEEE Second Int’l Conf. Computer, Control and Comm. (IC4 ’09), 2009.

Downloads

Published

2013-12-17

Issue

Section

Articles